Custom essays: The Disgruntled State’s Law

Many people in the U.S. and abroad called the law unconstitutional, because the document supposedly calls the police to check the documents on racial or ethnic grounds. Critics also note that, under the old rules, the right to inspect documents has only the federal immigration police, but some local authorities as well. Meanwhile, the majority of Americans support such harsh measures against immigrants. According to a survey by U.S. media, about 42% of U.S. residents supported the new law, 24% objected to its entry into force, 29% reacted neutrally to the new initiative. In early May 2010 the City of Los Angeles announced boycott to Arizona. They banned the city administration staff to travel to this state on business and enter into contracts with its companies. The reason was that same law, which, according to city authorities did not allow an American without a passport to get to Arizona. Opponents of the new immigration law of Arizona do not hide the joy: a few hours earlier, a federal judge suspended the American state of the text. It was signed by the Governor in April and was due to enter into force on Thursday. From the outset, the bill evoked strong criticism of the White House, human rights and the state’s population, 30% of which – the Spanish-speaking citizens. Views of the residents of the capital of Arizona: “My mother always said: people should be put out before they are taken your house, cook food and raised your children, and not after!” Considering the information mentioned above, it can be seen that this current law is not useful, it is local and not properly thought out. This entire situation is about the country’s policy and not about the local inventions.
According to many local politicians, the new law has also a negative impact on the tourism industry of Arizona – the state of Mexico borders on the south-west of the United States. A governor of Arizona Jan Brewer told: “I hope that this is a small obstacle in our way. And while we did not use all the means in the fight for the law, it is difficult to say how it will end. Whatever the turn of events after the judge’s decision will be, in any case, we and our enemies will submit an appeal. So the process cannot be avoided.” Also, according to the document, the police have the right to stop a person at any street, demanding to confirm the legality of stay in the U.S. In the absence of the evidence, the police will have the right to detain the alleged perpetrator.
Since April, many U.S. cities, including Washington, have had mass protests. The initiative of the authorities of Arizona has condemned the Government of Mexico. The U.S. Court invalidated several provisions of the immigration law adopted in Arizona. As reported on Wednesday, July 28, CNN, among the articles of the law has been blocked and one of the key – which gives police the power to stop “suspicious” persons and require their documents to prove the legality of their stay in the country. This decision was made by Judge Susan Bolton, considered the claim of the federal government filed against the Arizona law. In addition, currently under consideration by the judge there are still seven lawsuits against the paper. Thus, the law, which was supposed to start working in Arizona on July 29, will enter into force only in part, with the exception of locked court papers. Meanwhile, as the survey conducted by CNN in conjunction with Opinion Research, the majority of Americans support the adoption of the Arizona law. As reported on July 28 Politico, for this paper expressed 55 percent of respondents, against – 40 percent. In total, 1018 people attended. It is also noted that against the immigration law there were only 34 percent of white respondents; surveyed Latinos, the opponents of the document – 71 percent.